Ever hear of "crush videos"? They are films of small furry animals like kittens or baby rabbits being stomped to death by high heeled women for voyeuristic sexual kicks. Producers claim free speech protection for such videos and the Supreme Court at present is weighing the constitutionality of laws aimed at prohibiting the production and dissemination of such videos. I personally find it appallingly sick and ridiculous that such violent and cruel behavior should not involve jail sentences. Its exactly the same as the legendary "snuff flicks" where sexual thrills are gotten from real murders of humans. What's the difference if its defenseless animals being tortured and murdered for a vicarious thrill?
Categories
Monthly Archives
- July 2010 (30)
- June 2010 (27)
- May 2010 (45)
- April 2010 (49)
- March 2010 (38)
- February 2010 (40)
- January 2010 (45)
- December 2009 (37)
- November 2009 (33)
- October 2009 (52)
- September 2009 (15)
- August 2009 (37)
- July 2009 (28)
- June 2009 (32)
- May 2009 (33)
- April 2009 (28)
- March 2009 (32)
- February 2009 (51)
- January 2009 (80)
- December 2008 (53)
- November 2008 (57)
- October 2008 (45)
- September 2008 (31)
- August 2008 (63)
- July 2008 (111)
Pages
Search
About this Entry
This page contains a single entry by cul published on October 7, 2009 12:59 AM.
In a nutshell as it were was the previous entry in this blog.
Republican's Fact Impaired Miniverse is the next entry in this blog.
Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Leave a comment