Whitewashing Huck Finn

| | Comments (0)

I understand the reasoning behind this PC attempt to remove the 'n' word from Twain's brilliant period novel, but like almost all things PC, it diminishes the original power of intent and thereby reduces Twain's point in use of the word. Thankfully, the original Huckleberry Finn is in the public domain and freely available.

New edition of 'Huckleberry Finn' to lose the 'n' word

by Keith Staskiewicz

huckleberry-finn_240.jpgWhat is a word worth? According to Publishers Weekly, NewSouth Books' upcoming edition of Mark Twain's seminal novel Adventures of Huckleberry Finn will remove all instances of the "n" word--I'll give you a hint, it's not nonesuch--present in the text and replace it with slave. The new book will also remove usage of the word Injun. The effort is spearheaded by Twain expert Alan Gribben, who says his PC-ified version is not an attempt to neuter the classic but rather to update it. "Race matters in these books," Gribben told PW. "It's a matter of how you express that in the 21st century."

Unsurprisingly, there are already those who are yelling "Censorship!" as well as others with thesauruses yelling "Bowdlerization!" and "Comstockery!" Their position is understandable: Twain's book has been one of the most often misunderstood novels of all time, continuously being accused of perpetuating the prejudiced attitudes it is criticizing, and it's a little disheartening to see a cave-in to those who would ban a book simply because it requires context. On the other hand, if this puts the book into the hands of kids who would not otherwise be allowed to read it due to forces beyond their control (overprotective parents and the school boards they frighten), then maybe we shouldn't be so quick to judge. It's unfortunate, but is it really any more catastrophic than a TBS-friendly re-edit of The Godfather, you down-and-dirty melon farmer? The original product is changed for the benefit of those who, for one reason or another, are not mature enough to handle it, but as long as it doesn't affect the original, is there a problem?

What do you think? Unnecessary censorship or necessary evil?

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

Leave a comment

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by cul published on January 4, 2011 11:00 AM.

Signs of Distopia was the previous entry in this blog.

Fetish for the Constitution is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.